At least some students at Georgetown University want more conservative faculty. Mark Judge at Acculturated (also published on NRO) reports on an editorial in the official student newspaper, the Hoya:
Instead, they make a straightforward case that the dearth of conservative professors at Georgetown is leaving students unprepared for the genuine diversity—that is, the diversity of thought—that is part of the real world. Georgetown’s homogeneity, they argue, is leading to an atrophying of their skills for debate and reasoned argument. In other words, without conservatives, they have no one to test their ideas against.
They also review the evidence that that there are fewer conservative faculty members. The Hoya, Mark, and NRO are all correct to say this but they miss the big structural problems that make diversifying faculty so hard. The structural problems might be organized as graduating, teaching, and publishing.
Most faculty positions require a terminal degree, usually a Ph.D., and that is what we mean by graduating. To get a terminal degree you write a thesis and that is largely controlled by your senior professor. Graduating provides a bigger challenge if you are a conservative because few of those senior professors are.
Faculty members need to teach. The problem is that the curriculum is controlled by folks who are not conservatives. Thus we have Peace Studies
Sidebar: Here is the search for Peace Studies: http://search.privacysearch.net/q=cGVhY2Ugc3R1ZGllcw==&b=PC_80801124&qpt=na
It is one example of how new leftist programs are crowding out traditional, and often, more conservative programs. End Sidebar.
and many otherprograms that designed by and staffed by the Left. We talked to a military historian (we don’t know if he was a conservative but we suspect it) who said he had to leave because there was nothing for him to teach. One data point is limited evidence but all of the programs suggest the problem more strongly.
Publishing is one of the things faculty need to do to get promoted. Specifically, they need to publish at a level appropriate for their school. Major programs require “A hits” while comprehensives like our school are less impressed by prestige but require that you be active in reasonable journals. It is our judgment that leftist oriented journals have flourished to provide more outlets for them. We were happy to see them (leftists) succeed because it was good for the department and the college. There have been a couple of instances where folks have got a joke article published in those journals. So there is concern about the intellectual quality of such journals but more troubling is the report by Andy Ngo in Quillette about an article, The Case For Colonialism, by associate professor Bruce Gilley in Third World Quarterly (TWQ). It seems to us that the author was pointing out the obvious when:
[Bruce] argues that nations who embraced and built on their Western colonial legacy, for example, Singapore, have fared better than those who followed anti-colonial nationalist ideologies.
Instead, Bruce created a firestorm. There were 17,000 signatures from two petitions and 15 resignations from the TWQ editorial board. Seriously! You must read the whole thing. Andy leads with the most astonishing part:
An academic journal [TWQ]l that published a controversial article making a case for Western colonialism has withdrawn the piece after its editor received “serious and credible threats” of violence.
Bruce is lucky to be an associate professor as associate usually indicates tenure, but he might remain one for a long time as publications will be hard to come by.
Bruce’s situation is exactly why conservatives are not drawn to academia and exactly why it is difficult for them to survive. The Hoya is right about the need for diversity but it will take more than student editorials to bring more conservatives into the faculty ranks.