Pat Toomey in the WSJ is challenging The Donald on NAFTA:
If presented with this ultimatum, I will vote “no,” urge my colleagues to do likewise, and oppose any effort by the administration to withdraw unilaterally. Pulling out of Nafta by executive fiat would be economically harmful and unconstitutional.
We agree. We hope that Pat and the rest of the GOP Senate enforce their right of advice and consent and support free trade.
We would like it to be an easy call. Lower tariffs (taxes on American consumers) and fewer restrictions on trade are always good. Pat suggests:
[T]he administration can accept the advice from many members of Congress and others to modernize Nafta in ways that expand trade opportunities without curtailing American consumers’ freedom.
We entirely agree. It is not, however, likely to come down to an easy choice like that. The likely choice is a “new” NAFTA that expands trade freedom in some areas while restricting it in others. We need a full discussion rather than name calling to make the decision. Compromise is not necessarily a bad thing but neither is rejecting the potential new treaty. To get two-thirds support The Donald is going to need to be in the compromise business too.