George Will at NRO has a great article on the silliness of politics. He mostly indicts would-be Democrat presidential nominees but he shows his displeasure for their likely opponent. Benjamin Zycher from the American Enterprise Institute is also at NRO with the wildly misnamed The Confusions of The Conservative Carbon Tax showing how silly the right can be. The first misnaming is in the title. What would be “the” conservative carbon tax? We hope it is the MWG proposal but that seems presumptuous. To remind you, the MWG carbon tax proposal is a modest one, $20 per ton, that includes eliminating the the gas tax and federal support of alternative energy. After skewering some straw-men
Sidebar: Would straw-men mind being skewered? We think, like in the Wizard of Oz, they would be worried about fires rather than blades. Still we are sticking with alliteration. End Sidebar.
Benjamin starts his conclusion with an exactly wrong sentence:
Once conservatives have endorsed a carbon tax, they will have no principled answer to the endless pressures for more government intervention.[Emphasis added]
The answer is exactly the opposite. Since we endorse a carbon tax then we have principled answers for reducing government intervention. Particularly, we have the opportunity to reduce the current government support of “alternative” energy. In fact, the joy is that we could do both as one deal.
The rest of his conclusion is sensible:
Conservatives cannot defeat climate alarmism and the fundamental threat to freedom that it represents unless we defend first principles. In the context of climate policy, watchful waiting and adaptation over time are the only sensible approaches consistent with them.
One of the first principles of conservatism is to get incentives right or at least move them in the right direction. A modest carbon tax that eliminated the gas tax and reduced [yes, the principled answer is eliminate every bit of support but we need space to negotiate] alternative energy support would be a conservative step because it gets the incentives closer to right. If the left is unwilling to make a deal then we do what Benjamin suggests.