Steven Hayward reveals an interesting fact
In Vietnam, still run by the Communist Party, the very selective national university is offering free tuition to anyone who signs up for the university’s curriculum in Marxism. They’ve had to offer free tuition because no students have been signing up for these courses, as in zero. I can’t help but be amused that the market-clearing price for courses in radical philosophy is lower in a Communist university than in American universities.
Hayward’s factoid brings up an interesting problem in educational pricing: should we price programs differently and if so how? Here we are only about government funded schools. There are at least four ways to go about it.
- All programs are priced at the same cost
- Programs are priced based on cost
- Programs are priced based on value
- Programs are priced to produced desired enrollments
Alternative one is where most schools are now. Alternatives two and three should be correlated but three is really the dominate solution as value should be the driver of price rather than cost. Hayward’s factoid shows that prices in #4 have a limited impact on decisions.
Alternative #4 should be thrown out immediately. Central planning is bad planning. Individuals are better suited to make the decisions that relate to them. There is other information beyond price that will be discussed in the next post.
Prices should be based on value with cost being a second choice. Otherwise demand will skyrocket for cheap and valuable programs making it difficult to staff them. A potential problem is that high prices could make it difficult for low income individuals. Higher prices provide the opportunity to support other students.
There are important secondary difficulties with market based programs. How often should prices be adjusted and what is the program? Prices need not be adjusted every year to get an exact market price. Value of programs rarely changes dramatically so price changes are not that big a deal. What is the program is more of a challenge. Because students are free to change their majors, they would have an opportunity to game the system. English Composition should cost the same for all students. Program would need to be defined so that prices could be applied.
In short, a market solution needs prices that approximate the market value of each program. The approximation of market value might be cost as programs in demand are usually more expensive. We do not need perfect market prices. We just need better ones. Students can make good decisions and in demand programs can offer scholarships to offset higher prices.